Customer discovery
Find the first painful workflow.
The goal is not to ask whether people like the idea. The goal is to discover where breeding teams currently suffer: cross planning, diversity preservation, genomic prediction workflow, or CRISPR/edit prioritization.
Target list
| Segment | Who to find | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Plant breeders | Crop geneticists, quantitative genetics labs | Core user for cross decisions and long-term selection strategy. |
| Breeding data scientists | People building genomic selection workflows | Likely first champions; they already feel the gap between data and decisions. |
| Precision breeding / CRISPR | Plant gene-editing teams | Validate edit prioritization and edit-to-breeding strategy. |
| Agtech / seed startups | Founders, R&D leads | Faster feedback than large incumbents. |
| Microbial strain engineering | Directed evolution / fermentation teams | Possible second beachhead with short generation cycles. |
Interview questions
- How do you currently decide which crosses to make?
- Do you simulate selection strategies across future generations?
- How do you manage inbreeding and diversity loss?
- Which tools do you use for genomic selection today?
- What part of the workflow breaks most often?
- What data do you usually have: genotype, phenotype, pedigree, environment?
- Who owns the final breeding decision?
- Would comparing aggressive vs diversity-preserving strategies be useful?
- For CRISPR-enabled breeding: how do you choose edit targets and genetic backgrounds?
- What demo would make this immediately credible?